Kerry Graham
The concept of a prenuptial agreement entered into by a couple prior to getting married was
one which used to be seen as the preserve of high-net-worth individuals and celebrities, but
this has changed in recent years with lots of couples now far more likely to enter into second
or third marriages later in life following divorce or bereavement.
In cases such as this, people are far more likely to have already amassed some level of
personal wealth during their lifetime, and they are also more likely to have children from a
previous relationship. In circumstances of this kind, it’s only natural for people to want to
protect the assets they bring to the marriage, especially if there is an imbalance in wealth
between the couple.
Prenuptial agreements set out how any assets a person brings with them when they enter
into a marriage will be divided in the event of a divorce.
Whilst they are essentially contracts, drafted by legal professionals, and formally agreed and
signed by both parties, legally speaking, prenuptial agreements are not binding. However,
following several landmark rulings in recent years, the situation has become more nuanced.
These days, pre and post nuptial agreements are considered by family courts to have a
‘magnetic importance’ that should be complied with unless it can be demonstrated that they
were unfairly drawn up or would have an effect that is unfair.
It should be noted that prenuptial agreements are far more likely to be upheld by a court
considering post-divorce financial arrangements if it has been entered into in the right spirit.
In the event that a prenuptial agreement is contested in court, there are certain
considerations that will be made to decide if the contract is valid:
Did both parties agree to and sign the prenuptial agreement, and was independent
legal advice sought before agreeing to the terms?
Did both parties fully disclose the assets they bought with them into the marriage?
Was either individual placed under any pressure to agree to the prenuptial
agreement?
Was the prenuptial agreement drafted less than 21 days before the date of the actual
wedding or civil ceremony?
As well as being drafted in accordance with these strict conditions, a prenuptial agreement
should be revisited periodically and revised if needed in order to reflect any shift in the
financial status of the two parties. A failure to do so could result in a court deciding that the
agreement was no longer fair.
The details likely to be included in any prenuptial agreement include the following:
The assets belonging to each party, such as stocks and shares, savings and
properties
An explanation of what will happen to the family home in the event of a divorce
Details setting out who will be responsible for clearing debts amassed by either party
during the course of the marriage or civil partnership
Details of the assets which the children of any previous relationships will be entitled
to following any divorce proceedings
The birth of any child to the parties during the marriage
As well as being signed by the parties themselves, prenuptial agreements need to be signed
by two independent witnesses: one on behalf of each party. The witnesses need to be over
the age of 18 and can’t be family members. As well as their names, signatories need to set
down their address and details of their employment.
It is always sensible to seek legal advice before devising or signing any agreement of this
nature. Whilst not strictly ‘legally binding’, those drafted without following the appropriate
protocols will be far less likely to stand up to scrutiny and could result in assets being
apportioned unsatisfactorily upon the failure of a marriage.
Subscribe or register today to discover more from DonegalLive.ie
Buy the e-paper of the Donegal Democrat, Donegal People's Press, Donegal Post and Inish Times here for instant access to Donegal's premier news titles.
Keep up with the latest news from Donegal with our daily newsletter featuring the most important stories of the day delivered to your inbox every evening at 5pm.